Quote:
Originally posted by superb
You make it sound as if RC should be a salty snack. 
I guess you will be quitting Graal. You guys seem to misunderstand what integration will mean. If implemented correctly there will be numerous advantages to both players and developers in comparison to standalone programs. Integration does not mean you have to run client mode to access RC (unless this is the plan, which would be a bad idea). It should mean that client mode and rc mode can be accessed individually or simultaneously using one program. I agree that this will be horrible with bad implementation, but I have confidence that this is inevitably a step forward for Graal. Lets just see what happens before we dismiss the idea.
|
Ok that's acceptable if it's a shortcut to a few clients when you load Graal Client. But I still don't want this built in crap i mean these ideas seems to be from Mr Python himself i mean afterall he did start the project without asking or letting anyone vote for the stuff? I mean gezze before you go running doing stuff atleast let people vote,secondly he seem like he doesn't want to hear that people still wish to have there external rc. I have seen 80% of people have voted they want there external rc and yet this dude continues on his own little project. Are you the only person who plays graal? I know he came on the board to ask for ideas but adding a built in clinet to graal would suck. I mean if i intend to help out a few other playerworlds and i have rc on 2 servers mean i must get on 2 clients? A built in client should be for mac only now windows. And he said we must minimize stuff gezze this guy want stuff his way. I like a few of his ideas to update the rc but not this one x.x I mean if we must add in more stuff to rc such as skins or emotions...ect wouldn't this cause more lag? Also i notice my rc laggs when am saving backup files of the server soo i guess my client would crash when i try to download 2000+ levels. Yes go ahead Python take away the fun for graal staff x.x