Quote:
Originally posted by Projectshifter
Wow, good job with the whole modesty bit. You think that I am failing to match you? Sure... the only thing I fail to meet you at is your math, but then again that's only a small part of scripting, so get over yourself.
|
Given your lack of skill, it's not immodest to claim to outmatch you. And if mathematics is only a small part of scripting and maths are all I know then how come the things I've created are so much more impressive than yours?
Quote:
|
How conveinent for you that you can seem to try and bash me, but yet you can't come up with a solid example.
|
Do I need to? You're the one making the extravagent claims. You say that you are better than me at some areas of scripting? Why don't you prove it?
Quote:
|
Amazing, you rejected me how?
|
You remember all the times when I told you that I dislike you and think you're a worthless member of the GST. Yeah, that was me rejecting you.
Quote:
|
I wanted to be on good terms with you, but then it was evident how stubborn and obnoxious you were.
|
Right, right, you just happened to decide this after I told you to stop bothering me about being my friend.
Quote:
|
Don't tell me about rejection, you're just not capable of accepting that you are not the god of scripting, as you so blatently seem to make evident that no one can prove well enough that you're wrong. But you can't prove your right, so you're making yourself look MORE ignorant...
|
About the CNPC thing? I'm not the only one who thinks as I do. Is Tseng also an idiot because he doesn't value your arguments?
Quote:
|
Poorly coded? Amazing how 10 seconds ago you can't remember my coding because it didn't stand out
|
I don't remember the code itself because it was meaningless to me, but I don't need to remember the details. Every horrible piece of scripting I saw simply cemented the reality that you're a substandard coder.
Quote:
|
my coding is VERY similar to how Tseng and Jagen do it, same layout and format
|
Haha! I think they'd be insulted by that statement ^_^
Quote:
|
See, you won't LET anyone give you evidence, you just try and find logic loopholes and try and play it off as if everything wasn't made perfectly clear to you. If you're not right, you'll find an excuse as to how you might be if you stretch things out of their context or out of how they are commonly used.
|
None have you have given any evidence for me to dismiss! You've given irrelevant similes and yelled that it's "common sense", but never given any worthwhile arguments. I have countered each of your claims, only to be presented with more abject stupidity. If you can find even a
single example of me 'stretching something out of context' then feel free to post it, but otherwise you're revealing yourself for the oaf you are.
Quote:
|
I dunno how I POSSIBLY thought that checking every tile, then calculating the quickest and shortest path could POSSIBLY have to do with any mathmatical concepts at all... that is just absurd!
|
...you don't even know how pathfinding scripts work, do you? What areas of mathematics do you think I used?
Quote:
|
Where are your codings that are so great that you speak of?
|
I didn't speak of any code in that particular quote, but you could go look for the sphere if you wanted a recent display of good scripting.
Quote:
|
Yes, estimation does not have to rely on evidence, I don't think you know what it means. Estimation is a guess. It does not have to be an educated guess, as you so have proven.
|
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=estimate
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=guess
Spot the differences.
Again: I make an assessment of your skills, you make an assessment of mine. How is mine any less well-founded than yours?