Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
Read->Think->Post
Before you made that post, I had already stated that a Paladin is not an opposite of a Dark Paladin. Yes, Paladins don't have opposites. Nobody said that they do. However, 'light' has an opposite and that opposite can be used to describe a character similar to a Paladin but with an evil moral system. Like I said, the Dark overrides the default light.
No, because the entire identity of the necromancer is based around raising the dead. It's not something that can normally apply to light characters. Paladins just hit things with swords and cast spells - such concepts can easily apply to either good or evil intent.
This kind of semantic alteration may lead to some strange definitions, but that doesn't invalidate it. It's just simple manipulation of English.
|
Kai: Read->Think->Post->Read->Think->Post
Discharge: Read->Think->Post->Read
If you fail to see what I am saying; It is not that I’m not following that so delightful step-by-step posting procedure of yours but while your posting, I’m writing and have not seen what you’ve posted. I only see what your currently saying when I post because when you post which you obviously know, the internet explorer window refreshes the thread therefore allowing you to see the most recent post.
Edit: Ah see there we go again.