Quote:
Originally posted by Eric_1337
Well sure a playerworld that has been UC for like 2 years or something is gonna be atleast desent, I think it's rediculous how long Oasis has been up.
SA has made the most improvement out of all of them, SA has caught up to Oasis in like a 10th amount of the time which is very good.
Val, eh... I never like it at all... don't know why it's up there.
But since I have seen next to nothing from both... I'm not going to vote, I'd suggest Oasis get itself into gear or it's going to be over-taken by other upcoming servers. If you have been working on it that much for this long, I don't understand how we either haven't seen atleast a little little little more or that it isn't up already.
You know, Faheria did the same as Oasis did, tried to make it as great as possible, remaking over 3-4 overworlds to get a perfect overworld, awesome systems and npc's and UC for a long long time, look at where it is now. -.-
|
Where do you get your information? The back of a cereal box? How do you know SA is "caught up" to Oasis? Do you know the exact status of both servers? You also have to realise that Oasis is my first playerworld, while Soulblade has had experience with one already, so it's only fair to give me more time. Because when you think about it, Soulblade has been in the playerworld game a lot longer than I have, and has yet to release a public world. So in reality, SA has been in the works since Murasamune.
Oasis isn't having it's overworld remade 3-4 times either. It's the simple fact that while I am working alone, Soulblade has
some help.
Anyway, what is wrong with hype? Hype is usually followed by good things. Of course, sometimes the hype will build up just to let people down in the end, but that's not always true. I just figured this should be a fair competition. Like "I like <pw> because I think it will be good" not "I like <pw> because it isn't as hyped." or "I like <pw> because I worked for it" or "I like <pw> because it's getting done faster".
