[konidias]

The real matter we need to look at is not the kingdoms dominated by males, but the sexual harassment.

There aren't any people with any sort of power that are on GK enough to handle sexual harassment, or harassment of any nature. Once there are people that can handle these problems, the female player population will rise.

As for a kingdom run by females... I don't think it's necassary. It would do more bad than good, as it's just segregating the sexes even more. It would be nice if females led a couple of the current kingdoms though.

But people, look at the big picture here. The server is called Graal Kingdoms. King as in a man that runs a kingdom. If you're roleplaying by Medieval standards, you'd realise that there weren't "Queendoms" in the middle ages. There also wasn't any such thing as being sexist. In medieval times, men rules the land. So it's only fair to say that it's going to follow the same pathway on GK. Just read the name, it speaks loud and clear.

I'm not saying it's good to stick with the tradition, I'm just stating that GK was based around that, and that is why there currently are no women running a kingdom. If the rules were changed, then perhaps there would be, but as of right now, I'm pretty sure it's the King who rules a kingdom.