Quote:
Originally posted by azuretek23
free money? how is that? maybe I am not making myself clear, no one is taking away access or forcing anyone to do anything its just a week at the top... not because they did anything special but because it gives them a little bit of chance
Also if their quality dosent go up and its a trend that no one goes there even when they are at the top why not just shut them down? I'm sure unixmad would enjoy not having so many servers to worry about....
this would give the servers that care a chance and the ones that dont give a damn would get shutdown, I dont see a downside... your free money analogy didnt even make sense...
btw, if no one is going to your server it would kind of discourage you...
|
It was an example that had some paralells to this idea. To translate: treating low or "poor" PWs as though they were worth the time and putting them at the top of the list on a consistent basis will eventually convince the manager that they are entitled to it regardless of whether or not the improve thier server. You make it sound like the PWs at the top are responsible for the ones at the bottom. Technically, yes, but that is because they were able to capture the interest of players more than those at the bottom. They
had thier chance to capture an audience of players. Unfortunately, if they had any large mass of players, they were enticed onto other servers which obviously provided more. I do not understand how hard it is for many people to grasp these concepts.
Also the free money example: that money isn't "free"
Something called
taxes is where that "free" money comes from.