[busyrobot]

What you don't seem to understand is that most Kingdoms right now have the simple goal of building up without being overrun.

Some of the politics of late have resulted in treaties create imbalances of power that almost ensure that war will break out in the near future, and the main reason for this is some kingdoms have taken the stance, "better them than I".

The simple basis of this Pact is based on equality of members, and does not require anyone to cut current treaties.

If this is adopted, and an ally acts hostile towards another, then yes, the result would break that treaty. As the Astri are so concerned about peace, I don't think they would have to worry about this effecting them.

It you understand politics at all, which is the underlying mechanics effecting Kingdoms -period- (don't tell me how to run what) you will understand the goal of this treaty is to protect alliances while ensuring they are not abused to attack weaker Kingdoms.

It is designed to protect agianst the divide-and-conquer strategies that are preferred by those whos egos run on blood.


By the way, just why would peace by those who want it be such a bad idea for Kingdoms anyway?

You are quick to attack the idea as 'the worst ever' but you aren't backing it up with anything but insults.



Kingdoms don't need to be at war to build themselves up, and many prefer not to be at war right now anyway. What is your problem with that??