Quote:
Originally posted by Zurkiba
1) Not really... I wear my armor all the time and cast spells... they dont work when I have my axe in hand. Plus they can take it off.
2) Mage - They dont need HP do they? No... they just stand in the halls and cast spells and spells and spells. So they dont need HP. I've dueled some Mages before... they just cast some huge spell and then they run around in circles. So they dont need HP
3.)Alchemist - Not really... Soon there will be exp for making potions and what ever they do.
4.)Talisman - You dont need to use it in the combat zone... just use it in the halls.
5.)See... my point is this. What's the point of classes without ups and downs? I'm a Warrior and I'm almost as strong as the best mages X_x....
|
1.)Really. It doesn't become a real problem unless you're fully equipped, though.
2.)What the crap? Have you ever played as a mage? Mages need HP as bad as warriors do!!! And were these duels before or after the charging time was added?
3.)Alchs have already got the potion-exp thing, we've had it for a long time. Character level (and thus HP) is easy... but what about leveling in other areas, like physique? Are alchs condemned to be noncombatants? That would be bad game design. All classes should be able to fight (with different levels of effectiveness) melee battles. WITH armor and weapons, not just punching.
4.)No comment here.
5.)We all agree different classes should have different ups and downs. But I have to say, there must be a much better answer than your system.