[konidias]

People make up their own rules on this issue.

1. An account shouldn't be banned if it got "hacked" and the "hacker" did something bad on the account, since it wasn't the actual account owner's fault.

2. A person that borrowed someone else's account, should not have their actual account banned for doing something illegal on an account they didn't pay for.

Well, these are both wrong. Number one, the account that was part of the illegal activity, is banned. Number two, the person that got banned will have all of thier accounts banned. (this is ban evasion)

Just because you use someone elses account to hack, doesn't mean your account is safe from being banned. (note I just used "hacking" here, but this goes for any activity that is against the rules)

Also, your account never get's "hacked", it's always the cause of you using a trojan, you giving out your pass somewhere, or you having an easy pass to figure out. If your pass is 3a9r1nv2l34s2, no one is ever going to just figure that out by typing in random keys, and get into your account. They have to have your account and pass exactly. Also, if it was possible for the "hacker" to get your account without any actions from you, then they could easily get any Graal account, so why would they only "hack" yours?