
06-01-2002, 07:59 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 429
|
|
Re: Should P2P playerworld owners be.. paid?
|
If the owner of the playerworld charges to play on their server then yeah, but then they would of course have to pay Stefan a certain % for it since he made the game and is allowing them to have a server. LAT's, NAT's, GAT's, GP's, etc will also have to be paid for their services. This would then create major problems.
Problems such as these:
PlayerA will feel he is better than PlayerB and thinks he deserves to be paid more than PlayerB. At the same time it will suck for PlayerC who possibly produce better work than both PlayerA and PlayerB, but can't get paid because he/she is under 16.
A LAT on a playerworld feels that he/she can make better levels and script better than the owner so deserves more pay.
CorruptStaff knows PlayerE can produce better work than them and that person could possibly replace them. CorruptStaff finds any little reason to get rid of PlayerE
I don't need to go any further since I'm sure many of you get the idea.
There will be alot more problems similar to these. Some less and some extremely great problems.
(And we know they will happen because we are humans and we are greedy and selfish at one time or another)
If anything make it where only Graal Gold servers Staff can get paid.
~Prince Dark |
__________________
Criminal uses this account to post.
|
|
|
|