Quote:
Originally posted by Loriel
I believe this will lead to corrupt staff members who don't do their job, but just try to please players because they are now "in power".
Imagine me, as asst. guild admin, declining a copyrighted guild tag. Now all the people who were supporting it would probably give me a bad rating, although I have done my job.
In contrary, someone would blindly accept a guild, and all it's future members are going to rate him good, while he wasn't exactly doing his job.
I think this system is a good idea, and will definately help a bit, but it won't solve all problems. Most people, probably including me, will base the ratings they are giving out on personal opinion, and won't try to be objective - maybe not knowingly "unfair", but sure not perfect.
- Just my personal opinion, and I am not saying "Remove this rating system, it sucks!!!1" but "Think about how to improve it  "
On another note, and completely off-topic (besides the fact that unixmad will be reading this... hopefully), I am still confused why my ADCP Access was removed. I am indeed needing it to do my job, and was never informed of being fired, and even Tiki says that I am still his assistant. Please excuse this completely unrelated point, but neither Stefan nor Tiki could help me, and you didn't exactly make good experiences using forum PMs or email to talk to you, Unixmad.
|
Maybe have them write an essay on their opinion? lel. I agree with you man, however, life goes on. Improving upon it is a good idea, also in game, i hope not..."U pked me, I'm going to rate you bad!", or "You won't let me have rc, I'm gonna rate you bad!!!" I think it staying anonomious is good though. I can see it will lead twords depression for me,
the first vote for me that wasn't be was bad...
I thought i was kinda liked...*hopes it was just an accident*.