Quote:
Originally posted by ZanderX
1.3 servers means being sued when you're found out. Meaning, you're a dead duck by hosting one. Look at Mafukie.
p2p wasn't a solution to anything other than keeping Graal alive. It's a large business with a huge playerbase.
Yeah, so? If kids can't say "Hey mom, can I buy a year long account to a game for around the price of a game I can buy in the store that's not even online?", then that's their problem.
2. Yeah. Free Graal, which won't last because Graal needs MONEY to run now. You don't realize that. That's why p2p exists; to keep Graal in existence.
3. Uh?! The levels on Graal 2001 are AMAZING quality in most areas...Either you have the most sickeningly high and stupid standards or you don't have a good eye for levels, sorry man. :|
I'll agree about the staff bit though.
|
1) If there is enough Gservers, they wouldn't be able to take them all down, by the time they take them all down, others would sprout up, and multiply. All that would do is create more attention, almost encouraging more of them. I'd like to see 10 different parents who give their credit card numbers out on the internet. Guess what, chances of it happening are not very good. So it's kids problem that a game is not in stores, and they are not old enough for a credit card?
2) Free Graal? Like I said, as long as there are alternatives, the players will go there, it's technically impossible for at least 75% of them to get p2p. As for keeping Graal alive, they should have it worth the money they want to charge for it. Graal will still be alive, there are old Gservers and programs, if cyberjoueurs shuts down, then those will sprout.
3) The levels on Graal 2001 are amazing? That is a joke, isn't it? Those level are quite horrid, and quite frankly, I am serious. Maybe it is you that doesn't have the good eye for levels, I have heard many others who say the levels could be improved, and that they can. There is a lot more room for creativity, originality, and there are many tile errors that could be fixed.