In all honesty, being paid is attractive, however it would not be easy. I do agree that playerworld owners should be rewarded (I own Doomsday, maybe my opinion is biased
), as playerworlds are the real reason Graal has a big enough playerbase to become p2p. In my opinion, Graal's main attraction is the playerworlds, the ability to play in different places, not being confined to the one world.
However, could there be an alternate form of reward? Could we (as Funkee suggested) have a
http://www.graal2001.com/playerworld site?
Of course, you will then tell me that one would have to discriminate between owners of free playerworlds, and owners of p2p playerworlds. However, I think that both free and p2p playerworld owners contribute to Graal's revenue - free playerworlds attract the players to begin with, and p2p playerworlds encourage them to upgrade their accounts. Should they then be equally rewarded? I think so.
If we were to use Funkee's idea, this would save playerworld owners from having to pay for their websites, and concentrate more upon making a good playerworld
Therefore, the website idea get the thumbs-up from me ;x