[Tyhm]

Guys; half of you want him fired because you tried unsuccesfully to cyber him before you found out he was male, and as a result you feel that getting him fired will reestablish your masculinity. The other half of you seem to have forgotten that there's a big difference between talking and doing: he was talking with his girlfriend (a consenting person of opposite gender and legal age) about something in the depths of his subconcious. He did not actually do any of the things they talked about, nor had he intended to. He did not publish it, nor did his girlfriend: there was actually a hacker so unbelievably pathetic who hacked into his girlfriend's computer and (after failing to blackmail him with it) published it to everyone.

So why should we fire Peach? Marv Albert did worse, Marv Albert actually DID stuff, and he got to keep his job. We should fire an active admin, one who was given the opportunity to keep all of you from finding this out in exchange for turning a blind eye, because of your self-righteous indignation?

Do you even care that if this hacker had a life, you'd never have known?
Oh, but poor poor Annr. What the hell was she doing that got her jailed in the first place? Does anyone CARE? Shouldn't you at least take that into account before you try to get someone fired for jailing her?!?