[FatherDante]

Unfortunately, I can't give anyone understanding by typing them to you. Faith is faith, I will never defend religion because it cannot be defended. All I will ever offer is solid facts; I'm no fan of apologetics but the facts oftentimes validate the faith, but when they don't, I trust the facts.

I'll have to think. Firstly, non-marital intercourse is bad. So called "protection" does not offer adequate protection to curtail the numerous negative side effects of sex. Untilo it does, no matter how much "protection" is used, intercourse will remain an irresponsible decision.

Genetics is more evidence for evolution, not against christianity. The most minsunderstood fact is that Science and Religion never conflict with each other. God created science, science is objective, religion is subjective. To say otherwise is, as philosophers and mathematicians alike say, a "categorical error."

What I ask of each of you is that you simply recognize that no matter how passionate your feelings, subjective argument goes nowhere but to your own soul. If you want to influence people, or to make a respectible case, you have to provide factual evidence. The only exception is universally accepted ethical standards like "stealing is selfish." "selfishness is bad." "Honesty is good," etc.