Quote:
Originally posted by SSj_Link
I dont think you really understand what Im saying.
You have agreed with some and disagreed with some. Not all remade playerworlds are very good.
Bravo was an example. They took out all the levels, and are changing the name. To my knowledge that would constitute a new server and should be taken down and go through the reviewing process just like anyone else.
If the playerworld, then gets accepted, then put it up. If the playerworld is rejected, then dont put it up.
I think that is a fair and just way to do things. Everyone who has a good playerworld should have an opportunity to show what they have, if they get accepted. Old playerworlds who have no owners, or have been totally changed from the original concept should have to go through the same type of rules and regulations as any other.
I think that would be fair.
bgraven
|
What does it matter? It would be put up anyways because its a p2p server. Why do you think providence is up? Ive seen much better playerworlds than that (no offence). Im sure things will get better as time goes on.
Right now, the Non-P2p Servers are WAY better than the P2P (IMO), but as people learn how to use the NPC server to the fullest extent, im sure p2p will draw more attention than it does right now.
~War Lord Mpg2