Quote:
Originally Posted by amonrabr
in a semantical way to do it, "i" for me was icon/image or whatever, I really didnt want to put the tile italic..
|
That's not what it means at all. From the same link you quoted:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Your Link
The i element represents a span of text in an alternate voice or mood, or otherwise offset from the normal prose, such as a taxonomic designation, a technical term, an idiomatic phrase from another language, a thought, a ship name, or some other prose whose typical typographic presentation is italicized.
|
No, it doesn't. Read the link you quoted carefully.
Quote:
|
anyway, there is no problem to transform inline stuff in block or anything.. to make something really webstandart you have to see the tags as any normal Xml object, and by css you give them atributes.. I usually reset all atributes by css when I make something.. Actually any advance programm recommend you reset it http://www.google.com.br/search?q=css+reset
|
A CSS reset is used to remove irregularities between browsers so that any CSS rules in effect are intentional. They're not meant so that you can redefine what elements mean. All that does is mess with screen readers and search engines that don't parse CSS.
Of course you
can transform inline elements to block elements—I never stated you couldn't. I'm simply wondering why you would do that when there is already a more suitable element available. W3C would probably like to know, too:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Your Link
You should not use b and i tags if there is a more descriptive and relevant tag available.
|