Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoper
No offense, but you don't know what you're talking about. Being ETA isn't just about hosting. Yes, george hosts more often than i do.
He doesn't deal with the support center, doesn't worry about fixing events, doesn't have to deal with all the players that come crying from events (among which you include yourself as often as possible), doesnt check times/activity levels of current ETs, doesn't (unless requested) worry about new people to pick, and so on.
That's what he'll be learning.
I think 2 housing admins isn't particularly required, I'll agree with you on that. I've requested (and got zach's approval for) just taking the position since he's GBA now.
Please quit graal, if all you're going to do is hate everyone and everything in it. You know i love you rogue, but this is ridiculous
and, if i may, Wil was banned for legitimate reasons, so don't imply that he's banned because everyone dislikes him
|
Event's have been the same for years, I don't see anything that needs to be FIXED as far as IMPROVE; that's a personal option...
It's not that hard to look at a few numbers of online time, or to choose people. Last I saw he was massing the applications and choosing the new people (probably because that's training? but still it's not horribly difficult to do).
I complain to George more often than you, because you're never online.
Good @ 1 housing 1 GBA.
If I hated it I wouldn't care about any of this now would I? I want the best for Era/Graal, but sometimes (
all the time considering the audience) you have to complain/gripe to get anything accomplished.
I'm not going to go into great detail (could hit it for hours on this topic), but instead throw an example at this last part:
It is an utter double-standard. William was permaed at first notice without trial or anything, and reset despite that not being part of the 'norm' for account sharing. The player who completed this action was then promoted halfway up the staff roster.
Earlier today, using Era's definition of the crime, as well as Alfonso's personal policy of 'Automatic life (10 year) ban' I presented him multiple players who fit that definition that are currently ONLINE. He, instead of taking a similar action to the pre-described case, reamed me with unrelated information. Then logged off without responding.
Dunno how you could possibly call bull**** better than getting it from the Manager himself.
Then again, this will probably be turned into a 'ban' discussion somehow and be deleted so why did I type it?
Seacrest out ~
