Thread: If you could change one thing about GScript, what would it be?
View Single Post
  #1  
Old 07-01-2011, 03:50 PM
cbk1994 cbk1994 is offline
the fake one
cbk1994's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,718
cbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond reputecbk1994 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to cbk1994
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDunne View Post
I kinda disagree here. I think pushing GS's object system more towards Javascript and prototypical OO would be far better. I think it'd be way easier going in that direction than going back and redoing it in a different style of OO.
It would certainly be easier to do that, but I think ultimately GScript would be better if it had used a strict system. Keep in mind:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbk1994 View Post
Compatibility with old code is not a problem—even a change as drastic as strict typing is acceptable for this exercise.
On that note, I've proposed JS-like prototypes for GScript multiple times and would love to see them added.
__________________
Reply With Quote