Quote:
Originally Posted by salesman
You said the failure rate is much higher now than it was in 2001. When Oladahn said that they're actually about the same, you brought up the fact that there were more servers back then.
I said 99/100 servers failing isn't much better than 10/10 servers failing. Larger amount and history have nothing to do with rate of failure.
|
That wasn't even my point. My point was back then, in 2001 there wasn't some long history of failed projects. Most projects were new, it was all a new environment. Graal had been around for a few years already but you hosted the servers yourself. Then P2P came around and people had to up their quality to get hosted. Regardless, the point is back then people could at least talk crap because they didn't know any better. Now it's been somewhat like 10 years and only one or two servers have actually made it(whether they pushed the envelope or not is another discussion). So really, given the track record of Graal as a whole everyone should just zip their mouth and if they need to prove something then do it by actually completing a server. Otherwise it's just tiring.
And 99/100 servers failing IS much better than 10/10. Why? Because there is actually a server making it.