Quote:
Originally Posted by TSAdmin
I'd be careful with the ideas you throw around, especially if they're sarcastic. We've all seen how that can turn out.
|
My idea wouldn't be taken for about three reasons.
1. Total Negative choice to be made If they wish to keep their players in any way.
2. It would fall under "Unnecessary work to be made."
3. The players would utterly reject having such a feature put in place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TSAdmin
To the reply about "TSAdmin playing mummy", though I'd prefer "daddy", I'm only an enforcer of what exists. There is only so far my authority can stretch to change things the players desire. This is not one of those things I can change and can only stick to enforcing. I feel the need to "play daddy" mainly because barely anybody else has the balls to. And yes, I won't hide the fact that I mean Stefan and Unixmad when it comes to stating that. But the fact of the matter is, the ball for changing things like this is in their corner of this court. I just stand out in front waiting for them to pass it to me and/or my team which only occurs when they've done something we can work with.
|
Thanks for being honest about the situation. So we can safely assume unless Stefan makes a call about this being available or not then there is nothing more to talk about right? you claim you have the balls to be "daddy" about this yet when It comes to the actual problem being approached you'd rather stay in the dark being the secretary telling us to wait for an appointment to get things done. Isn't it your job to be the bridge between the players and the big boys along with being administration?