Quote:
Originally Posted by Twinny
Does anyone else find it mildly retarded that many UC servers have both an (owner) and then 1 or more (co-owner) staff guilds? Same logic applies to manager guilds.
When I see this, I tend to think the owner is an idiot and it's one of those lovely servers you can pretend to be working for them but only working for yourself.
Thoughts?
|
I like the way new servers are all like begging for scripts, then once they get staff tool (boots, etc...) they only think about having fun, they hire tons of GPs/FAQ/ET when there is not even a single player to care about, then they play, play, play....'Till they realize 6 months are gone and that they only wasted time and money.
Owner is the guy who pays for the server, so if there is a co-owner, it means both paid for the server (so that dude would help)
This apply also for Manager, but I tend to think Co-Manager would then be Head Developer.
I still can't understand why there should be an owner AND a manager.
From the moment you rent a server, it should mean that you have your own projects and that you will work hard to get them realized.
I find it ridiculous when I see some people even saying "Hiring Manager !"
