Thread: Inexcusable?
View Single Post
  #1  
Old 04-10-2007, 10:59 PM
DustyPorViva DustyPorViva is offline
Will work for food. Maybe
DustyPorViva's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 9,589
DustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond reputeDustyPorViva has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to DustyPorViva Send a message via MSN to DustyPorViva
Inexcusable?

We all know Graal has 'standards' when it comes to levels, or at least styles or such that people like, and others that people think are ugly. But is it exceptable for levels to be 'low quality' if that's what the server is going for? As you all know (points to my thread I made a month or so ago), Zelda 3 levels are nothing like what Graal levels are like nowadays. They also aren't like what Graal levels were 5-8 years ago. I don't think Graal has ever really matched the simple style of Zelda 3 properly, but it seemed no one ever had a problem with the levels in Zelda 3. Anyways, my question is, if a server is going for the same style, would levels get the same criticism that other levels do because of their simplistic and blocky style?
Reply With Quote