Quote:
Originally Posted by Googi
Huh? Is this a serious post? My post has nothing to do with democracy, nor do I even advocate anything resembling democracy. It's about logic. There's no logical reason to believe that a moderator's opinion is more valid simply because it is held by a moderator.
|
Define logic.
You seem to be under the impression that logic means what makes sense to you.
However, logic does not come in to play in the sense you believe in the slightest. There is perfect logic behind people holding power making decisions they believe correct. They hold all of the power, you have none of it. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that their opinion is more worthwhile than yours.
The opinion of the Moderator's is what happens. Your opinions are inconsequential - whether you are furious or pleased with a business makes no difference to the business. You cannot change what the business does, so take it or leave it. The business has absolute power as long as you agree to its terms, which you clearly do by continuing to renew your subscription. No one has a gun against your head stating you must remain here, yet you act as though you are Abbe Sieyes leading a revolution against a dictatorship more oppresive than the French Monarchy.
They have the power. You have none of it. What you determine logical is irrelevant. What they determine logical is highly relevant. Their opinion is more valid simply because their opinion has power behind it.