Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimson2005
1 month of inactivity  |
I agree, one month is plenty of time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hampy
I vote yes, after 1 month of inactivity. But the leader of the guild should be told to sort it out after say 3 weeks
|
Possibly an e-mail, or even an NPC server notification, with the warning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikomi946
I would say a 6 month time frame since many who are in college and universities often have rather long absences but do return. Or there's that nasty addiction to other online games that often keep them away for awhile.
|
If the ENTIRE guild is away to University... well, I don't know, that just sounds so stupid. Disban the guild.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ibonic
I guess maybe this also shouldn't apply if the guild leader has an active VIP (or Gold?) subscription.
|
No, everyone should be effected, they are neglecting/ignoring their guild, and just burdening the guild system having inactive guilds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minoc
%0 activity, after a month.
Old guilds (5 years or older) should stay regardless.
|
I agree, and disagree. I'd love to see them stay, it serves as a reminder to old times, but at the same time I want everyone to be treated equally, and if the guilds were allowed to die out completely, they should finish the cycle and be disbanned. Maybe an immunity list, once old guilds like this are disbanned, they are not allowed to be remade?