Quote:
I see the point in it:
- it's not good for Graal to have several 0 playercount servers in the list
- when rebuilding/renovating a server, there is no way to estimate a date that you'll be finished. could be two months, could be ten.
- just because your server is classic does not mean you get the advantage of totally rebuilding it and then having it be classic without passing any inspections (see: "as long as it can be put back up as soon as we are ready to release the new overworld")
I see the last point as the biggest problem. You have servers that go up and then a week later they are back under construction again and then when they finish they just re-release the server without getting passed. They could have very well made the server worse and nobody would know until they played.
I'm making the 2k1 revision and it was removed from the public list as to not cause confusion. I totally intend on getting my server passed and don't think I'm just going to say "okay I'm done, make it classic again", because "it" is no longer the same server that it originally was.
So anyone who thinks it's okay to leave their 0 playercount classic server on the list while they spend an unknown amount of time developing for a re-release, and then expects to release it without it getting passed is taking advantage of the system.
|
Koni, I think you may have overlooked this part:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Maasharu
I really don't care if Delteria gets taken off the list anymore, as long as it can be put back up as soon as we are ready to release the new overworld.
|
He's basically saying that it would only be pointless if Delteria were removed from the classic list and then never permitted to be classic again.