The problem is we can't allow personal attack against anyone, staff or not if we want a friendly community. Lot of other communities have made the same choise including wikipedia, slashdot ...
If you have bad opinion about a staff or the administration, then open a support ticket and give proof of what you say and you can be sure we will take care of your opinion.
The moderation is not made to make everyone happy but to make a friendly community. Rules are made for the majority of player and are not always fitting for some minorities I can understand it makes some of you unhappy if they are member of such minorities.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gerami
I respect that it's your job to make sure we don't write things that are illegal and out of control, but you must also realize that deleting posts because they are "negative" bothers people. For example if someone makes a thread giving specific reasons why a global is bad or why a server is bad, I believe the thread should not be deleted. As long as there's proof and valid points to the person's post, I find it ok but moderators including yourself do not seem to agree on this. Why?
Don't you think that heavy moderation = increasing anti social activities? If people can't voice their opinions (if extremely negative, backed with valid points and proof) is this not actually bad?
I'm glad you left the topic open for discussion rather than quickly lock it, shows improvement on your part.  |