Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GryffonDurime
Kingdoms Administrator- My job is to ensure that the Kings are doing their jobs, that large events are approved and developed, and generally that Roleplaying dosen't infringe upon the Canon, rules, or the non-Rping sectors of the server.
|
You're going to be swamped with people who simply don't want to roleplay. That won't even touch the ones who roleplay poorly.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GryffonDurime
The Kings are responsible for each and everyone of their members, and will be held accountable for their kingdoms as a whole. Should the kingdom's activity or quality slip, or if the King is found guilt of corruption/nepitism, they will be warned, or if the actions were warranting, will be removed.
|
It's a great idea, but it's not a likely or realistic one. What criteria will you use for proof? Is it unfakable?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GryffonDurime
I'm not here to do the King's jobs for them. I'm here to make sure they do them. If 2k2 had a Kingdoms Administrator, they would have not only been able to enforce the fact that Drow do not exsist in the in-house Graal continuity (by order of Vermain), they would have had no shortages of complaints with which they could remove the Drow from power: metagaming in the sense of allowing Etien to enter the kingdom by nepitism and powergaming in their ability to summon
the freaking Cthullu, amoung other charges.
|
And just think: people
pay to roleplay that horribly. Imagine,
imagine, how bad the classic gamers will roleplay.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Googi
If the leader is bad, then they can be removed. Kingdom leaders take care of bad RPers. The Kingdom Admin and/or manager take care of bad kingdom leaders.
|
Do you think a roleplaying admin would fix GK?