Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darlene159
lol, Gambet
your replies simply means that you say things to cover yourself
Spark didn't explian anything, his reply left the rule wide open, and left big loopholes.
|
His reply was quite clear. It requires a case, everything he said would have to be examined, and then a decision be made.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Darlene159
Somewhat valid? What the heck is this? A loophole? Skirting the rules? If someone has no completely valid reason to remove several things, and then quit, just to leave the pw to put backups up of working content, it should be against the rules
|
A loophole? Uh no. THERE ARE valid reasoning for removing content. Whether YOU plan on believe the person or not is up to YOU (on a personal level, I mean). If the globals do not see things the same way you do, then that's just how things are. Somehow you have to take everything so negatively.