Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
But they might care about the advances that it facilitates.
Let me guess: You don't know anything about them?
|
You guess wrong, as usual. Just stick to the stuff you know.
It is doubtful that they care about the advances it facilitates to the point where they are drooling over (or even care about) every single update released, which is almost always based on fixing something in GS2. In fact, I bet they don't even pay attention to GS2 stuff or know about it (probably don't read newfeatures) It's too bad you're not quite as intelligent as some people (including yourself) might think you are. Take your attitude somewhere else, parrot. I'm tired of your repetitious arrogance.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by haro41
protagonist, would you rather have had graal stay as classic, expanding and evolving on itself, rather than changing graal into something new? In a sense, moving forward, not upward? Its interesting to think about what could have been. We could all still have been playing classic to this day.
|
I had more fun in the classic days. True, it might have worn itself out, but before P2P there were people who were alot nicer. Not everyone was, but there seemed to be a greater number of just plain nice people. Also, the "classic" gaming feel was why I started playing. Not because Graal was the most graphically advanced game on the market, but because it was Zelda-like.