[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by falco10291029

Yes, your hypocricy does

NO UR STUPIDITY DOES LOL

So very tedious.

I see no harm in adding something small like that, as long as it isn't in place of an actual argument

What if it's an accusation or an insult? You don't need to back those up?

I;m relying on other to judge based on their experience

Okay. Then let them do so, and stop telling them what to think.

Of course, that might not work out for you. Already two people have disagreed with the opinions you assigned to them

Human want for a judgemental basis, and they serve that purpose

Huh? If you're going to invent terms, please define them at the same time. What is a "judgemental basis" in this context?

No, you are stubborn because you ignore proofs, when that is all you look for to begin with
You have yet to show any proof of any of your points.

Could I not equally say the same to you? You've gotta learn to think from more than one angle, hoss.

Even if I showed something, you'd deny it

Which can only be interpreted as a bad thing if you presuppose that you're right. In other words, you can't make that accusation without doing the very thing you attribute to me!

Anyone can function without belief

As a normal human? Hardly. Why would they eat, if they didn't believe that it would help them survive? Why would they do anything at all?

I work on experience

Ah, so you believe/assume that your memory actually describes real events?

I would accept it if it's commonly accepted in grammar

What, people can only prefer something if it's commonly accepted by stupid people?

That shows you at least don't like it

It shows that I objected to G-Yoshi's behaviour in that particular instance. It doesn't show that I think nobody should ever ignore parts of a person's post. For example, a person misinterprets me and writes several paragraphs based on a misconception. Would I be a hypocrite if I wrote only a few lines, clarifying my meaning?

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with ignoring sections of a person's post. It depends on the circumstance. In this instance, I ignored your 'point' because my own paragraph already covered the topic.

We damn well both know nothing of the sort ever happened, on the other hand, I properly recall the one i posted

We damn well both know that exact conversation happened. On the other hand, neither of us recalls the one you posted.

Well for one, you shook off the DEFINITION I gave you

Which?

First of all, Neutral party my ass

What, Soul Blade and I are the best of friends? Presumably you have not seen the last conversation we had.

third, ionstead of saying "Your arguments=FLAWED!!!!!!111" give examples and explain how, idiot

Maybe he should've just said that "your stubborness blinds you from the truth". That's perfectly acceptable, right?