03-07-2005, 05:07 AM
|
|
Registered User
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,712
|
|
|
No, I dont agree on this. The regular flamethrower attack is already really long, and it wasnt very useful on
1 v 1, so the "s" attack was created. You were playing pretty lame with the flamethrower "s" attack a few minutes ago tao, so I dont see why you're complaining about it. I think its fine as it is. |
|
|
|