Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
Padren, do you even read the posts?
According to your own words you are now supporting me. So thanks I guess.
But if you support me then why do you continue to hassle me?
Read posts from now on Padren and you MIGHT be able to argue.
You dont get the quotes, you put them in obsurb replies. If I said 'In the beginning God made the heavens and the earth' you would go, 'Exactly that's why everyone should get one dollar from the government'.
You're not using your mind, and you're keeping it closed.
And no, I'm not close-minded. If I'm closed-minded then I guess all of your teachers are too because they teach the basics and the truth. If I told you that 1+1=2 and you tried to convince me that 1+1=3 then I am not close-minded.
|
You are really loosing it Zurk, meltdown much?
I have been very consistent. You feel that since you feel there is a discrepency between 2k1 and 2k2, all of 2k2's history should be scratched to hold true to the 'truth' that was 2k1. I argue, to do that, you have to ignore the 'truth' of all of 2k2's history, and that doing that would have a deleterious effect on GK today.
No one is trying to deny any truth, there are two debates: 1) is the 2k1/2k2 timeine broken - something as Zen says, appears unlikely.
2) if it is, is it better to fix the break by saying the past was different, or saying the present is different. If condition 1 is true - I still contend that if you are to break one of the two history lines, the old one that has little to do with current events is the best to break. In the case of condition 2, the only real 'truth' is that there is a fracture in the history lines, and covering up either side amounts to going against 'the truth' so why break the truth in a fashion that hurts GK the most?
I am being perfectly clear, you are just loosing it Zurk.