Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
READ MY DAMN POSTS DAMN IT. I've already given you an answer
Archigos Republic
|
You have given no historical reason why a nation known as the Zormite Republic would suddenly change their name to the Archigos Republic, it seems they've liked their name so far, why change now? That would be ignoring the truth of the name they have held for all of GK.
A teacher once told me that the only constant of the universe is truth. Which is why I say that you are wrong. But you have failed to understand this.
---
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
I fail to understand why you want Zormite to be a human kingdom. 'Because people want to rp as a human'? Well they can join Samurai, Dustari, or Pirates.
|
Who are you to tell people they can't be human in Zormite? Zormite has had humans for years - and thats the truth, which is the only constant of the universe.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
The whole arguement isn't why aren't there Zormites on 2k2. Far from it. It's why are you calling people Zormites when they're not. 2k2 has taken one of the best organized and played traditions of Graal and taken a big stinking crap on it. Why's that?
|
Meh, honestly the old zormite doesn't sound that interesting, I mean, come on, if you want to play with any of your friends or trade etc, you have to be ooc or kill their human butts. How can you have a xenophobic race in a game where all trade and resources are gathered in one giant middle island?
Of course, if they were that way on 2k2 from the beginning, I would be defending their right to be that way.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
What's so hard about just renaming it to the Archigos Republic? It fits the theme.
|
Not really, they are kinda proud of being zormites actually.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zurkiba
If the current Zormites are following the 'old' traditions then how come they're not following the traditions of the Zaeri? Not to mention, the Zormite Fascism has already denounced the previous history.
|
We could bicker down the details to the point of explaining every little nuance in a satisfactory way, at which point you'll ask why so and so had oatmeal for breakfast when bacon and eggs were so common.
The real question is where do you get off being judge and jury? We are just humoring you afterall. My point is that every single question you are asking is about the details of evolution zormite culture, but not one of your questions actually challanging the plausability, which is your intention. You hope that no plausable explaination is possible, and somehow, boom, zormite will become fish people or change their name. Your line of questioning has ceased to challange the plausability though, so I think you are more or less filibustering at this point (based on your use of that word).