Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
Then do quote your words of wisdom and put me in my place. So far all I have seen is you say "Zormite is fish" dispite the fact it has clearly not been, that "Nappa is a true Zormite" when no one in Zormite would consider him one and he fails any meaningful test of what it is to be Zormite.
|
I never said any of those (excluding the Zormite are fishes part)
Obviously YOU do not know what it is to be Zormite
And I am not going to go through this thread because you're too lazy to use your damn finger. You want everyone to do the work for you because you're just damn lazy.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
You have said that "2k1 is more important than 2k2" without giving any reason why. You have made the -decent- point that the sequential story line of 2k1 to 2k2 is broken by the shift to humans, and I never disagreed with that. I have not seen you make any argument though how preserving that story line at the expense of GK history is in GK's better interest or serves the interests of why 2k1/2k2 had a storyline in the first place.
|
Have I really stated 2k1 is more important than 2k2? Doubtful, so stop putting quotation marks around stuff I've never said.
I've already answered the rest of your question in a previous post.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
You have not given any reason why 2k1's history, is more important than 2k2's history. You have stated that it makes a story, and that the story is better preserved by ratifying 2k2's history. But if you are going to ratify the story at all, why not ratify the 2k1 history instead, since no one has been playing with the derivations that set that history apart from GK...for the entire history of GK? That would have a much smaller (zero actually) impact on players today, yet would fix the discrepency that bothers you so much.
|
It would be similiar to if Lord of the Rings came out, then the Two Towers had Jean-Luc and the Enterprise attacking the Klingons. It just doesn't work. The same for this situation.
About the change 2k1 history, no. If that happens then Graal Kingdoms is dead and the rest are retarded. It would be as if you took Shakespere and spit on it, then you rewrote it all.
If you would actually open your mind you would've understood the misinformation part. But no, you're too ignorant and stupid to understand any of it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by busyrobot
Personally, I think that the hiccup in the history, should be worked around in a way that preserves both histories the best, but I guess I am sentimental that way. I suppose if you are really die hard set on having a consistent storybook style history, it would not bother me if you changed 2k1 to fit 2k2's history, but I suspect it would bother a lot of old players, and if that was the case I'd still end up arguing it should be left alone or the impact minimized.
|
Read above.
----
I'm getting tired of fighting with you. You just cant argue. It would be if you were to be in a quizbowl with a mentally handicaped person who has never been in school.
So stop repeating yourself and if you want to post here then post logical things. And listen to me when I tell you that you are wrong.