Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
Then a lot of people are right. You can't just redefine whole segments of the English language and invent equivalence where none exists. It's easy to see what the 'insult' is supposed to mean, but you failed to articulate that meaning properly.
|
No, just a lot of people aren't smart. If you look at the way it's worded, you can define it anyway the english langauge would allow, one way being how I said it is, and the creator decides which one is correct. Therefore, the argument IS valid because the way i interpreted it is allowable by the English langauge, and is how the creator meant it.