Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Era Bugs and improvements (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=163)
-   -   Lockers. (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86877)

Nataxo 07-13-2009 08:49 PM

Lockers.
 
We need more, or solutions.

Currently like 95percent of the lockers have owners, and that other 5percent are lockers being sold for 10k.... (way tooo expensive.)

So, I'm suggesting another Locker building in Southridge or anywhere...

Also, make a script that only alouds 1 player to buy 1 locker per building at least, and only allow people with Graal Accounts to use them (I've seen a few pc:####s)

Another suggestion is that make a pre-pay limit, like you can only pay 5 months locker time as max, so players that get banned or just quit their lockers get sold in a few months

Scary_Sock 07-13-2009 09:21 PM

Agreed. I hate it when a player buys out ALOT of lockers, then think they can control the price somehow. Its unfair, and it should be the same way with houses with the time limit rule. You get banned/jailed for a month, the house/locker will go on sale.

DarkCloud_PK 07-13-2009 09:34 PM

As a new player to this server since Classic has tanked I support this.
All the lockers besides a couple are all used, and there is no affordable way for me to store my items.
Right now I am hesitant to mine too much or buy a different gun because I am near my limits of storage on my player, I have no way to manage my inventory. :(

cbk1994 07-13-2009 10:26 PM

I agree, it's definitely a problem, though we've got some ideas for the future.

For now, I'll see about adding a cap on the time you can put on lockers and limiting players to one locker.

Pelikano 07-13-2009 10:33 PM

No it is not a problem, it makes houses/hotel rooms actually useful

Frankie 07-13-2009 10:41 PM

I suggested this a long time ago.

lockers and locker buildings should be deleted. instead, each player should be able to access a safety deposit box at the bank. it will still cost just as much money as a locker along with having to buy more time for it. when the time runs out, instead of it being like a locker where anyone can buy your locker and take your items, the deposit box will go inactive and you won't be able to access your items until you pay up.

would be a much better system in my opinion.

salesman 07-13-2009 10:52 PM

Last I checked you could only buy one locker, but there was no limit on how much time you could purchase

DuBsTeRmAn 07-13-2009 10:53 PM

I still have my locker, Has like a year of time left.. But i don't use it because it is on SR XD

Crono 07-14-2009 12:08 AM

Cheap apartments to expensive housing should be used instead of "lockers" lol, come on people it's 2009 already. I'd expect some kind of housing system to have been worked on by now.

cbk1994 07-14-2009 12:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salesman (Post 1506799)
Last I checked you could only buy one locker, but there was no limit on how much time you could purchase

It's supposed to be like that, but when I checked why it wasn't working, it's been commented out in the script.

My guess is it's thinking people still have lockers when they don't, and now that everyone owns multiple lockers, I'm not sure what the best way to limit it would be; it might not be possible with the current system without using some messy code.

Frankie 07-14-2009 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono (Post 1506816)
Cheap apartments to expensive housing should be used instead of "lockers" lol, come on people it's 2009 already. I'd expect some kind of housing system to have been worked on by now.

there are hundreds of lockers and people are still complaining that they can't get one. how would a housing system help this? era doesn't have room for that many houses, lol.

Crono 07-14-2009 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1506829)
there are hundreds of lockers and people are still complaining that they can't get one. how would a housing system help this? era doesn't have room for that many houses, lol.

They're called apartments, you could easily fit ~20 apartment rooms in a single building and still make it look attractive + like a real apartment building. Better yet start having apartment complexes and whatnot.

Spikedude 07-14-2009 02:06 AM

Have like a communal locker in unstick me, like the Stash for everyone who played Diablo II. Then, you can make it so you have to buy access to it every month if you want.

Vman13x 07-14-2009 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1506798)
I suggested this a long time ago.

lockers and locker buildings should be deleted. instead, each player should be able to access a safety deposit box at the bank. it will still cost just as much money as a locker along with having to buy more time for it. when the time runs out, instead of it being like a locker where anyone can buy your locker and take your items, the deposit box will go inactive and you won't be able to access your items until you pay up.

would be a much better system in my opinion.

I really like this idea.

To amsel: I played diablo 2 but then got bored and quit lol.

Why not bring back redfox?

Another question is why do staff get to have houses where their friends have access to the rooms for free while others have to buy and pay for their stuff.....

Nataxo 07-14-2009 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1506829)
there are hundreds of lockers and people are still complaining that they can't get one. how would a housing system help this? era doesn't have room for that many houses, lol.

There are two apartment buildings that are currently closed on Era :o


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.