Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Kingdoms (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=49)
-   -   Graal Kingdoms Kingdoms (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=84856)

Tigairius 03-27-2009 09:38 PM

Graal Kingdoms Kingdoms
 
There are a couple of pretty inactive kingdoms on Graal Kingdoms right now. We don't have the playercount to really sustain useful kingdoms.

So, in an attempt to make Kingdoms more useful, if we were to remove a kingdom or two, which kingdom(s) do you think should be removed?

cyan3 03-27-2009 09:41 PM

Forest is the most inactive kingdom with almost no active members.

sango_ku 03-27-2009 09:43 PM

Forest !

bioboi 03-27-2009 09:44 PM

I think leadership is the problem, not so much the Kingdom as the problem.

Googi 03-27-2009 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cyan3 (Post 1478477)
Forest is the most inactive kingdom with almost no active members.

Then removing it won't do anything to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms. If you really want to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms by removing a kingdom, you have to remove an active one.

cyan3 03-27-2009 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bioboi (Post 1478479)
I think leadership is the problem, not so much the Kingdom as the problem.

The leaders for Zormite and Forest are very inactive. Samurai's leader is active but not online much. The leader of CP is not active however Arri is doing a good job of running the kingdom.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi (Post 1478481)
Then removing it won't do anything to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms. If you really want to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms by removing a kingdom, you have to remove an active one.

The 2 most active kingdoms are Dustari and CP. For example if CP was removed most of the memebers would join Dustari.

Tigairius 03-27-2009 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi (Post 1478481)
Then removing it won't do anything to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms. If you really want to increase the concentration of members in the other kingdoms by removing a kingdom, you have to remove an active one.

You bring up a good point, but one of the reasons I'd like to remove a kingdom is to give more space for future updates on land that can be traveled to by ship. Right now I think some of these kingdoms are a waste of space.

Felix_Xenophobe 03-27-2009 09:55 PM

imo having only two kingdoms would be enough.

bioboi 03-27-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felix_Xenophobe (Post 1478489)
imo having only two kingdoms would be enough.

I like this idea, because maybe then people wouldn't be so afraid to war each other without 3 other kingdoms jumping in.

Nature2 03-27-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felix_Xenophobe (Post 1478489)
imo having only two kingdoms would be enough.

i would love only 2 kingdoms!

Maxo14 03-27-2009 10:03 PM

2 Kingdoms sounds like a good idea.... Pirates vs Dustari ;]

Googi 03-27-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigairius (Post 1478484)
You bring up a good point, but one of the reasons I'd like to remove a kingdom is to give more space for future updates on land that can be traveled to by ship. Right now I think some of these kingdoms are a waste of space.

Unless you mean HDD space, I don't see the problem. Forest and Zormite each only get half the northern border of main. There's no reason any other kingdom couldn't share half its current border with a new island. It would even be better to put the updates on kingdom islands without removing the kingdoms. Inevitably people will complain about one kingdom or another getting an update seen as better than the others, but people don't quit over that kind of thing. People quit over kingdoms getting removed.

Hatred89 03-27-2009 10:05 PM

Woah this thread got a lot of responses quick. Anyhow could you not just generate a new map and link them to the other side of the kingdoms? Like lets say you link something to the right side of Samurai and thats a new map with monsters on it. The right side of that new map would connect to the left side of Dustari? The top of this new land could be linked with Forest/Zormite and the bottom to CP? That way you can sail around GK as if its a circular world?
Its just one thought but yeah I do have to agree even when GK is active it doesn't seem to be active enough for all kingdoms to stay. I think removing one might be good enough and if it doesn't seem good enough in a month or two we remove another?

ImmortalHuman 03-27-2009 10:16 PM

Zormite is the currently the most inactive kingdom also being run by an inactive king.

cyan3 03-27-2009 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ImmortalHuman (Post 1478511)
Zormite is the currently the most inactive kingdom also being run by an inactive king.

Forest has been inactive for much longer than Zormite.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.