![]() |
Graal Kingdoms Kingdoms
There are a couple of pretty inactive kingdoms on Graal Kingdoms right now. We don't have the playercount to really sustain useful kingdoms.
So, in an attempt to make Kingdoms more useful, if we were to remove a kingdom or two, which kingdom(s) do you think should be removed? |
Forest is the most inactive kingdom with almost no active members.
|
Forest !
|
I think leadership is the problem, not so much the Kingdom as the problem.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
imo having only two kingdoms would be enough.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
2 Kingdoms sounds like a good idea.... Pirates vs Dustari ;]
|
Quote:
|
Woah this thread got a lot of responses quick. Anyhow could you not just generate a new map and link them to the other side of the kingdoms? Like lets say you link something to the right side of Samurai and thats a new map with monsters on it. The right side of that new map would connect to the left side of Dustari? The top of this new land could be linked with Forest/Zormite and the bottom to CP? That way you can sail around GK as if its a circular world?
Its just one thought but yeah I do have to agree even when GK is active it doesn't seem to be active enough for all kingdoms to stay. I think removing one might be good enough and if it doesn't seem good enough in a month or two we remove another? |
Zormite is the currently the most inactive kingdom also being run by an inactive king.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.