Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graphic Design (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Semi-transparency (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78627)

gemini2 02-08-2008 02:55 AM

Semi-transparency
 
I was wondering if anybody knew of a good program for applying semi-transparency to images. Anyone willing to share? :>

Stephen 02-08-2008 03:00 AM

Adobe Photoshop

Ter13 02-08-2008 03:22 AM

Or if you can't afford photoshop, you can always use "The Gimp".

I use Photoshop on my desktop, and the Gimp on my laptop. I do most of my developing on the laptop anyway, so I tend to use the Gimp more than photoshop.

Though, the Gimp is honestly the better option for pixel art. Photoshop can be good for pixel art, but you have to muck with some settings that remove Anti-aliasing and feathering, as well as pressure. Most people can't figure out how to disable these right off the bat. The Gimp has a lower learning curve, but doing the more difficult advanced things you can do easily with photoshop are much harder in The Gimp.

<sarcasm>
Hang on, because I didn't say it enough times in that last block of text:

The Gimp
The Gimp
The Gimp
</sarcasm>

Stephen 02-08-2008 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ter13 (Post 1374103)
Or if you can't afford photoshop, you can always use "The Gimp".

The real question is if you can afford high speed internet - and if not that, the patience required to obtain it on anything slower.

Ter13 02-08-2008 04:05 AM

I see what you did there. And while I have my own pirate personae on the internet, I understand that others aren't quite savvy enough to scour the Pirate Bay for kickin' lewtz. ;P

I was just tossing out a legal suggestion, even though the illegal one seems much more lucrative.

Stephen 02-08-2008 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ter13 (Post 1374110)
I see what you did there. And while I have my own pirate personae on the internet, I understand that others aren't quite savvy enough to scour the Pirate Bay for kickin' lewtz. ;P

I was just tossing out a legal suggestion, even though the illegal one seems much more lucrative.

Who mentioned anything about anything illegal? Don't soil my thread with your trash talk.

gemini2 02-08-2008 04:19 AM

Seems okay. Thanks, Ter :>

Xterminator 02-08-2008 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1374111)
Who mentioned anything about anything illegal? Don't soil my thread with your trash talk.

Lol :cool:

kia345 02-08-2008 01:24 PM

Paint.NET

Ter13 02-08-2008 01:54 PM

Paint.net is another good one, but I don't like Paint.net for anything more than layered pixel work. I prefer the Gimp because of the photoshop-like layout.

cbk1994 02-08-2008 03:44 PM

Gimp makes me want to die. As does Photoshop (less so).

I'm just weird that way.

Fireworks ftw

Ter13 02-08-2008 03:54 PM

Never much cared for fireworks, personally. Usually, I start out in MS Paint, make a basic outline. Then I jump into Gimp/Photoshop, and do the shading using layers, that way I can easily modify the image later on.

Next, I compile a png image, and take it into Flash MX. I trace the image and make an object, with each separate bodypart on a different layer. I use MX to create new poses and animations, then take the new pose into paint and make the outline for that pose, and repeat the process of shading.

=/ I like my method, even if it is time-consuming.

Jeffyy 02-08-2008 07:00 PM

If you have windows XP without the new 2007 Microsoft office there is a program called Microsoft Photo Editor, I use that for my transparencies. :P

Tigairius 02-08-2008 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbkbud (Post 1374154)
Gimp makes me want to die. As does Photoshop (less so).

Probably because it's too complex for your simple mind to grasp. I have no idea what I would do without Photoshop.

cbk1994 02-08-2008 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigairius (Post 1374175)
Probably because it's too complex for your simple mind to grasp. I have no idea what I would do without Photoshop.

I only accept insults from family and friends ;)

Clockwork 02-11-2008 08:19 PM

Also Gemini, for further investigation. Once you get either of those programs, and ask "how?", semi-transparency is also called 'Opacity'. :)

trifle 02-11-2008 09:45 PM

Have in mind that graal gfx's like heads etc can't have semi-transparency on them. Just 100% or 0%

Crow 02-11-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trifle (Post 1374611)
Have in mind that graal gfx's like heads etc can't have semi-transparency on them. Just 100percent or 0percent

Wrong. Semi-transparency works on heads and all that stuff, too.

Also, how the f did you use the percent sign in your post without getting a "Bad request" error !pissed!

trifle 02-11-2008 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow (Post 1374614)
Wrong. Semi-transparency works on heads and all that stuff, too.

Also, how the f did you use the percent sign in your post without getting a "Bad request" error !pissed!

I have never gotten a head to be semi transparent online on graal. The only gfx's I have made semi transparent is scripted opacity objects.
And if it's possible, why has noone used that function before?

Stephen 02-12-2008 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trifle (Post 1374624)
And if it's possible, why has noone used that function before?

Quite simply - because everyone is too nooby. I use it frequently.

Rufus 02-12-2008 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by trifle (Post 1374624)
I have never gotten a head to be semi transparent online on graal. The only gfx's I have made semi transparent is scripted opacity objects.
And if it's possible, why has noone used that function before?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1374647)
Quite simply - because everyone is too nooby. I use it frequently.

Yeah I used it once too for a head on Classic, but it doesn't work on bodies I think.

Vimerge 02-12-2008 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1374696)
but it doesn't work on bodies I think.

It does...

Crow 02-12-2008 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vimerge (Post 1374698)
It does...

Yea, but you have to get the palette in the right order yourself, since using gif2mng to fix the image's palette will **** up the semi-transparency. Atleast it did when I tried, I'm not sure if I got the newest version.

cbk1994 02-12-2008 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow (Post 1374714)
Yea, but you have to get the palette in the right order yourself, since using gif2mng to fix the image's palette will **** up the semi-transparency. Atleast it did when I tried, I'm not sure if I got the newest version.

Why use gif2mng anyway? Just export them as an 8-bit PNG? Pretty sure there are tutorials to do this?

Stephen 02-12-2008 10:57 PM

How you save a 24bit GIF is beyond me ;)

cbk1994 02-12-2008 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1374788)
How you save a 24bit GIF is beyond me ;)

Who needs GIFs?

PNG ftw

Crow 02-12-2008 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbkbud (Post 1374793)
Who needs GIFs?

PNG ftw

Using gif2mng with /b as paramater will fix up the palette of any image to fit the default Graal body palette.

trifle 02-14-2008 06:22 AM

This is strange.. I have never thought it would work.
I usually set the colors to index colors, witch automaticly takes away the opacity. But just saving it with RGB works...
hmm... learned something new :D

Kirble 02-14-2008 02:33 PM

O.O Yeah, there are two ways to set the trans. The easiest way in Adobe Photoshop is via indexed colours, the alternative shows up when you get an already transed image and put it into PS. Not sure how you do it within PS but you don't really need to when indexed colours is there :p


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.