King,Queens,Emporers,Empress',Arans,Taris,Governor and, Governess.
 

Do men kingdom rulers or women kingdom rulers really need a partner to ruler the kingdom with them? I see kingdoms being ruled by themselves but whats the difference in having a partner ot not? Just someone to help out in looking after and taking care of the kingdom? Don't you think all kingdoms should have 2 rulers (One man, one women.)? I seel people saying they don't need or want a person to rule with them but wouldn't it take a load off them? :confused:

It is up to them if they have a 2nd ruler i don't see the point in forcing them into it.

For RP yes but since everyone pretty much just does thier own thing then there is no need for it. Kingdom leaders already have someone to help out that they have picked.

I think it's better to have 2 leaders, if one goes inactive for a short period of time the other one will still be around. Also if one does the debug work and the other one does events it would be a lot better for the kingdom.
It doesn't matter what gender the leaders have they only need to do a good job.

Depends on the prefrance

Depends on their failureness.

Lol

A Kingdom can run fine even without a 2nd ruler you should not force kingdom leaders into it if they don't want to.

If a leader is to go inactive they will have a 2nd in command who may not be a king/gueen.

Well its the emperors or empress' choice to marry

It is not a Question of IF they need a secondary. But more so IF they are ready to take on all the responsibilities on their own.

Though it can be wise to have a single leader for fast response to certain decions, those decisions may not always be best.

Having two leaders can be nice for redundancies, however in the case that they disagree, or worse, one is inactive for extended period of time... Well you get the idea..

Then theres the composite group, two leaders, and the council. Though this is normally a prefered setup, it has its major draw backs. Namely inactive members of the council or one, or even both of the leaders. With a council, the group can be sufficient enough to managed the normal day to day, however the major issues such as battle plans or even alliances would have to be dealt with by either leader.

As for the normal thought of kingdom leadership, just the King of Queen and their mate in rule, is rather narrow minded but still can work, so long as they have proper management. It worked for CP while Alan and Alisa were around.

The real issue here, is that your kingdom needs to be given its sub leaders, not multiple main leaders. I'm talking about Generals of your various rank divisions (Admiral, Archmage, General, etc...).

** In the Forest kingdom "Aran" is King, and "Tári" is Queen, however we tend to follow the third mentioned.. Draxx and I are not married, in which case Forest more so resembles a dual monarch style, and we are to have a council when we find the appropriate individuals for such.

** Please don't quote my entire message, this just gets redundant when you do such.