Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graal Kingdoms (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   New kingdom leaders (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73242)

Ravenblade1979 04-02-2007 04:39 PM

New kingdom leaders
 
Everyone sees the problem with the kingdoms these days. Their rulers aren't active enough. Take Samurai for instance. Stroms only on for kingdom debug but i don't see him on tag doing kingdom stuff. What about Zormite? Where is Drakeero or the person who is supposed to be making sure that ppl are active and adding new ppl Uri. What about CP and Alan..he's barely on.

I know some of these people have lives but if you are expecting not to be online for a while give it over to someone else so the kingdom can still be active.

These kingdoms should call a general election if they feel that their Emperor/Empress, King/queen, Governor/Governess aren't on enough. The kingdoms can be so much more then they are now.

Your opinion?

No flaming me for bringing up a good point or to see if you can get a rise out of me.

Oops just realized i misnamed the topic..sorry.

MadScience7 04-02-2007 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ravenblade1979 (Post 1295871)
What about CP and Alan..he's barely on.

.

You didn't have a problem with my activity last weekend, when I was on helping you kick Samurai's rear :p Seriously, if there is a consensus to remove kingdom leaders for inactivity, you should look at at a couple month period or long term participation history. Anyone can have a week or two of challenging real life, but the people who keep coming back consistently every time are the ideal ones to have as leaders. Picking someone who is on many hours each day for the past month or two sounds easy, but a lot of the time those people burn out and just quit. That's my two cents.

Ravenblade1979 04-02-2007 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MadScience7 (Post 1295940)
You didn't have a problem with my activity last weekend, when I was on helping you kick Samurai's rear :p Seriously, if there is a consensus to remove kingdom leaders for inactivity, you should look at at a couple month period or long term participation history. Anyone can have a week or two of challenging real life, but the people who keep coming back consistently every time are the ideal ones to have as leaders. Picking someone who is on many hours each day for the past month or two sounds easy, but a lot of the time those people burn out and just quit. That's my two cents.


Personally I heard you weren't gonna take part in that event. I agree a couple months would be good. Odd that you would reply..lol

Waltz5 04-02-2007 09:29 PM

I'll say it again... give kingdoms islands to battle over with minor kickbacks.

The leaders are not "active" because there is no reason to be.

MasterNuke 04-02-2007 09:37 PM

Are there even enough people to occupy five kingdoms?

SayianOozaru 04-02-2007 09:55 PM

Doesn't GK's player count stay below 40 or so? ( I usually only see 40 and less on.)

Googi 04-02-2007 09:59 PM

Tell me you won't accept any offers from the staff to replace a kingdom leader and I'll start taking you seriously.

OasaTor_PK 04-02-2007 10:32 PM

Oasa to rule them all!

Stephen 04-02-2007 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi (Post 1296031)
Tell me you won't accept any offers from the staff to replace a kingdom leader and I'll start taking you seriously.

Are you as excited as me? I'm going to lead Zormite again!

Lylic 04-02-2007 11:17 PM

Strom is currently banned, some guy edited a photo so he was saying something racist.

MajinDragon 04-02-2007 11:22 PM

I don't know why screenshots are taken that seriously these days as editting is very easy and many people are capable of it.

Lylic 04-02-2007 11:46 PM

Yes, Strom is active. Anyways, we have the great Shelly taking care of Samurai also. CP is also a very active kingdom, Alan gets on whenever he has time.

Crow 04-03-2007 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lylic (Post 1296053)
Strom is currently banned, some guy edited a photo so he was saying something racist.

Are you damn serious?._.

Fraszle 04-03-2007 12:30 AM

Yes, It shouldn't of been done. Even though these posts will probably be deleted, because we shouldn't talk about bans on forums.

cbk1994 04-03-2007 12:45 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lylic (Post 1296053)
edited a photo

That's impossible!


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.