Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Classic Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Vulgar Chat Now Recorded (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69914)

jake13jake 11-07-2006 07:56 PM

Vulgar Chat Now Recorded
 
Vulgar chat is now recorded.
I would instruct the GP to only use it if there are complaints about someone being harassed. I have no intention of it being used to jail players for cursing in private conversation, etc. However, I don't control how it will be used, so talk to Stryker if you don't like it. Frankly I'm not shocked at how large the file is after one day.

Also, I'm not making an effort to make it not record certain words that conflict with spellings of words that are not vulgar, simply because the purpose is not to isolate vulgar language.

Darlene159 11-07-2006 08:34 PM

Cool...I might start playing classic again :)

xAndrewx 11-07-2006 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159 (Post 1240266)
Cool...I might start playing classic again :)

You didn't play due to vulgar messages? =O
Cool addition :cool:

KuJi 11-07-2006 09:24 PM

PHP Code:

function onActionServerSide(action)
{
  switch (
action)
  {
    case 
"chat":
    {
      
savelog2("chat.txt"format("%s: %s"player.accountparams[1]));

      break;
    }
  }
}

//#CLIENTSIDE
function ChatBar.onAction()
{
  
triggerserver("gui"this.name"chat"ChatBar.text);



Darlene159 11-07-2006 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx (Post 1240300)
You didn't play due to vulgar messages? =O
Cool addition :cool:

Correct, and harrassment. Seems the staff is commited to solving the problem though. :)

KuJi 11-07-2006 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyld (Post 1240329)
Why do you insist on posting scripts in these threads? The thread's purpose is to inform you that the system already exists.

Boredom =(.

I think it's a stupid idea to log every single person's chat and send it to the server to log it.

but it can't be worse then the guy who did a 0.05 timeout triggering the server to just get the current chat and save it.. I felt bad for the 150 mb file in an hour =(

xAndrewx 11-07-2006 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi (Post 1240324)
PHP Code:

stuff 


Wrong, that records all. This one just records the Vulgar messages :P

KuJi 11-07-2006 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx (Post 1240377)
Wrong, that records all. This one just records the Vulgar messages :P

o pff.

PHP Code:

this.chatrecord = {{"words""here"}};

if (
ChatBar.text.contains(this.chatrecord))
{
// SEND



xAndrewx 11-07-2006 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi (Post 1240388)
o pff.

PHP Code:

this.chatrecord = {{"words""here"}};

if (
contains(ChatBar.textthis.chatrecord))
{
// SEND



Re-check :(
lol

KuJi 11-07-2006 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx (Post 1240399)
Re-check :(
lol

Either one works.. or suppost to?

maximus_asinus 11-07-2006 11:00 PM

I'm hoping this cannot log vulgar messages sent in toguilds...

This is starting to borderline invasion of privacy me thinks.

Darlene159 11-07-2006 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus (Post 1240415)
I'm hoping this cannot log vulgar messages sent in toguilds...

This is starting to borderline invasion of privacy me thinks.

It should only be used to check on a message that was reported. I'm sure that is the purpose of it (or I hope so)

nikomi946 11-08-2006 12:17 AM

Yes, thats its purpose. To be able to prove whether a complaint is manufactured chat to get someone in trouble or actual chat. I for one don't want to read through hundreds of MB's of logs just to pick on someone. Its only for claim substantiation.

zim5354 11-08-2006 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159 (Post 1240340)
Correct, and harrassment. Seems the staff is commited to solving the problem though. :)

I wonder why you were harassed x_x

Minoc 11-08-2006 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zim5354 (Post 1240545)
I wonder why you were harassed x_x

Because many players are too childish to confront her by other means?

-Ching 11-08-2006 02:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Minoc (Post 1240550)
Because many players are too childish to confront her by other means?

whats a more mature way? hatemail?

Twinny 11-08-2006 04:12 AM

I made a chat recorder thing on N-Pulse but it wasn't always on. High member GP's had to authorise it and it recorded everything until taken off.

KuJi 11-08-2006 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Twinny (Post 1240655)
I made a chat recorder thing on N-Pulse but it wasn't always on. High member GP's had to authorise it and it recorded everything until taken off.

Done on Era already (infact I am logged.. how cool) - and is on GX as well.

Rufus 11-08-2006 05:43 AM

This would be pretty easy to evade wouldn't it?

KuJi 11-08-2006 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1240692)
This would be pretty easy to evade wouldn't it?

sure @$$ Hole Migger DITCH KOCK SUCKER (example of avoiding it)

lol, but yeah.. will be easily - above is an example.

btw, I can bet I get an infraction for this =1

Twinny 11-08-2006 06:26 AM

Kuji - your probably on high infracture alert. You better believe the mods are taking extra care to check your every post ^^.

I don't think constant monitoring is wise. I do prefer having the ability to monitor someone who haasrepeatedly done bad stuff but monitoring from go seems...invasive. Next there will be a room which has NPC's cloning each player showing their actions and speech ^^.

1984 / Big Brother anyone?

maximus_asinus 11-08-2006 06:33 AM

Ultimately I don't mind these additions, aslong as they are being used for what they were designed for. I don't want to see a couple months down the road (but probably will), GPs handing out warnings/jailings for profanity said in playerchat, or a toguilds if it wasn't reported as harassment/used in general conversation with another player.

Twinny 11-08-2006 06:39 AM

I hope GP's don't use logs as evidence 2+ weeks on. These logs should automatically be deleted after a certain amount of time..


It would suck to be jailed by a GP based on swear word count over 6 months ^^.

jake13jake 11-08-2006 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KuJi (Post 1240694)
sure @$$ Hole Migger DITCH KOCK SUCKER (example of avoiding it)

lol, but yeah.. will be easily - above is an example.

btw, I can bet I get an infraction for this =1

uhh... that would actually be picked up just for the fact that it's very lenient in what it records.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159 (Post 1240340)
Seems the staff is commited to solving the problem though. :)

I wouldn't say that statement is quite right. Staff... committed? So why I resigned as LAT Admin is a lie? Yet, I'm still doing a lot of the work, and meanwhile PR is threatening to remove my RC, though I don't believe he has a right to.

_Z3phyr_ 11-08-2006 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyld (Post 1240329)
Why do you insist on posting scripts in these threads? The thread's purpose is to inform you that the system already exists.



Actually I appreciate the display so that I know it is simple, it works, and in this particular instance I learned how to make things happen when the player hits Enter in the Chat box text.

didn't know that. call me a noob.

smirt362 11-08-2006 12:51 PM

You could probably easily set up a warning/auto-jail system that gives you so many warnings and then sends you to jail/silences you for a certain amount of time. I think we have something like that on the mass system on Maloria.

Rufus 11-08-2006 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jake13jake (Post 1240733)
uhh... that would actually be picked up just for the fact that it's very lenient in what it records.

What if I cursed in French?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jake13jake (Post 1240733)
..meanwhile PR is threatening to remove my RC, though I don't believe he has a right to.

It should be the other way round in my opinion.

Tyhm 11-09-2006 12:00 AM

I think it should default to Off, and be activated by players. Thus, if someone's being harassed, they can turn on the recorder and Viola, evidence. Since players tend not to have access to serverside strings, relatively hacksafe...

jake13jake 11-09-2006 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyhm (Post 1240943)
I think it should default to Off, and be activated by players. Thus, if someone's being harassed, they can turn on the recorder and Viola, evidence. Since players tend not to have access to serverside strings, relatively hacksafe...

Yea, but if there are a lot of them turned on it has the potential to lag the server to death.

Crono 11-09-2006 08:58 PM

i quit classic then :(

Tyhm 11-10-2006 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jake13jake (Post 1241193)
Yea, but if there are a lot of them turned on it has the potential to lag the server to death.

...as opposed to them all, always being on? I think you've confused me-
Me: It should be something players have to turn on - you activate it recording incoming vulgarity to be used as evidence in a formal complaint, the rest of the time it's off.
You: But then if everyone turned it on at the same time, the server would lag to death.
Me: ...isn't that what it's doing now, Everyone has it turned on?

Maybe if it recorded multiple instances of the same people - all 20 people in level 14 turning it on and recording 20 instances each of the 19 other people each swearing - that could be a problem...

jake13jake 11-10-2006 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyhm (Post 1241408)
...as opposed to them all, always being on? I think you've confused me-
Me: It should be something players have to turn on - you activate it recording incoming vulgarity to be used as evidence in a formal complaint, the rest of the time it's off.
You: But then if everyone turned it on at the same time, the server would lag to death.
Me: ...isn't that what it's doing now, Everyone has it turned on?

Maybe if it recorded multiple instances of the same people - all 20 people in level 14 turning it on and recording 20 instances each of the 19 other people each swearing - that could be a problem...

I thought you meant recording all chat.
Anyways, it's much much much simpler just to have it on all the time, and shouldn't lag the server at all.

KuJi 11-11-2006 01:17 AM

recording all chat is death to the npc server x.x

Glefistus 02-02-2007 02:24 AM

wtf, classic used to be the only cool server swearing wise cuz they didnt care much. this sux, I am considering quitting classic 0.o

killerogue 02-02-2007 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glefistus (Post 1272276)
wtf, classic used to be the only cool server swearing wise cuz they didnt care much. this sux, I am considering quitting classic 0.o

This is what the Graal community has come to. :mad:

Polo 02-02-2007 05:22 PM

I should probably clarify this.

Personally, I don't care if you swear in messages to other player as long as your both happy for that to happen. The reason this was introduced was that before we would get a complaint about swearing, but have no evidence to go with it. Because of this, lot of people were reporting fellow players just to get them in trouble, often when they had not sworn at all. With things recorded, we can easily verify any claims, which just helps us from wrongly warning people. We are not going to troll through the history just to catch everyone who ever swore, it's only there as an aid for when its required. Anyway, in most cases players are not getting jailed for swearing unless it's very severe and persistent. In that case they are fully aware of what they are doing and will have had warnings (both informal and formal) before hand.

I should probably also point out that theres been quite an increase in vulgar mass messages over the last year or two, something that is preventing a lot of people from enjoying mass messages. I just wish people would have a little more thought about what they are massing at times, as Graal is a game for all ages.

Hope that clears thing up. You are welcome to ask me more about it in-game if you wish.

Devil 02-02-2007 05:55 PM

Considering at the end of the day, they are just words, words that people have been told that they are "bad".

I can't believe people actually cry over such little things. I would hate to see what they would be like in person.

Darlene159 02-02-2007 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polo (Post 1272398)
I should probably also point out that theres been quite an increase in vulgar mass messages over the last year or two, something that is preventing a lot of people from enjoying mass messages. I just wish people would have a little more thought about what they are massing at times, as Graal is a game for all ages.

The mass messages is why I was glad to see this implimented. I agree with you in saying it doesn't matter what people say in private PM's, as long as the other person doesn't mind, but like you, I wish people would show a little restraint in public/mass messages. Not everyone wants to read that stuff.

Devil 02-02-2007 06:56 PM

Don't get me twisted, I really hate going on classic (when I used too) and every man and his dog would be massiving absolute CRAP.

Tyhm 02-02-2007 08:59 PM

Thought:
There should be a seperate category for Persistent Messages. Instead of getting the same mass several times because that one guy wants to make sure everyone hears him asking where he get ying-yang in box, send a Persistent message and it's "stickied".
Also makes it easier for the GPs to figure out who's sending them, since it'll be there for a while if they're abusing it.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 05:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.