Also a suggestion: Array enhancement
 

Well, I'd like to see simple variables that contain string or numerical values be accessable by variable[0], so instead of returning 0/nothing, it should return the value of the variable. Same goes for things like array.add(obj).
That might easen things when working with variables that are stored in the player and can be edited manually. So the script won't just stop working when you forget a "," at the end of the value.

I don't understand what you're trying to say. o_O

Sorry, what I meant is, if I've got, as example, client.foo with the value "bar", I want to be able to do things like client.foo.add("qux"); or client.foo[0] (which should then return "bar"). At the moment this only works when the value got a suffixing ",", meaning it gets recognized as an array.

? i think in gscript2 any variable used like var[0] will return the value of the variable (unless you have commas in there, which it would treat as a seperator between string list items), because it's necessary for compatibility with using string lists like that

edit: I think fry is correct, it will not work like I describe

Well, okay, but then there are still functions like add(obj) or index(obj).
EDIT: Well, we just tried it, it doesn't work :)

Let me check that I've understood properly. If an array operation is performed on a non-array variable, it should be treated as a single-element array?

Yea... I do believe that's what he's saying.

yeah, that's how a string list should be

Why?

For compatibility to old script?