what do you prefer?
 

a few players critising the way I wrote a review, with opinion, brought some doubt in my mind so I've decided to ask this question.
by the way I will be nulling my vote.

Unopinonated reviews are boring, whereas opinionated reviews have a much greater potential for comedy and colourful fights between the reviewer and reviewee.

i definately agree with you googi :-) actually i think i will vote; just cause i made the poll doesnt mean im excluded

Opinion adds better dimension to the review. People might want to know what other people think. Penny Arcade didn't get where they are now without being fairly opinionated.

I barely understand how people REVIEW without their opinions.

"This is the game.
These are the graphics.

___ / 10 (Insert your own score here)"

maybe you should vote ;-)

last night i had someone review Graal News and they said I used too much opinion and bias but context is what helps a story come alive otherwise it would be dull, if you involve feelings of whatever it helps make the story really bold and understandable.

*highfive* You win the poll.

hi kan i pls be a writr?! enlis isnt muh 1 langwidge but i try reel hard. ^^ pls konzider me.

haha hmm you've made the list... i mean the blacklist
jokes

It's French, right?

No, it's French-Canadian. The most filthiest language in all the lands. :[

Also, Mr. Journal dude, I could see about doing a weekly comic for this news thing. :)

a weekly comic sounds awesome... lets discuss that on aim; now :D

Aim is in my pro-- OMG I JUST GOT AN "ACCEPT MESSAGE" THING... I WONDER WHO IT IS!

was it god? okay lets get back on topic :D

Better to have un-opinionated information followed up by opinions.