Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tech Support (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   64bit... ? (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53093)

Loriel 06-11-2004 05:48 PM

64bit... ?
 
Anybody with me politely asking for builds of Graal client and RC for 64bit CPUs? ^^

VeX_RaT_Boy 06-11-2004 06:32 PM

I don't know much about this, and I hope that you do not mind asking; but what is the diffrence between 64bit CPUs and 32?

Crono 06-11-2004 07:42 PM

64 are twice as good :P? That would be my guess.

Malinko 06-11-2004 11:09 PM

I used 32-bit on my other comp and it didn't support DirectX lights, but when I put it back to 16-bit, it worked O_o.

darkreign3 06-12-2004 04:04 AM

lol... if you make graal to good then the ****ies with crappy computers would not be able to play. xD that would be the best

-Ramirez- 06-12-2004 05:30 AM

I don't think anyone who has posted so far has the slightest clue what Loriel is talking about.

Anyway, I'm not with you. :P I'd rather actually BE ABLE TO DOWNLOAD 3.1 within the next decade before I'd want a 64-bit version, even if I DID have a 64-bit processor.

Loriel 06-12-2004 01:08 PM

A 64bit version would not be /that/ much effort. And I cannot run the 32bit version at all because I am not going to set up all the stuff needed for 32bit emulation just so I can run the few nonfree apps I still depend on.

Loriel 06-12-2004 01:09 PM

Yes, indeed, because you would not be able to run a 64bit binary either.

Spark910 06-12-2004 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Yes, indeed, because you would not be able to run a 64bit binary either.

Exactly, so whats the point.
If nobody would be able to run a 64bit binary other than you and I assume a handfull more it's very stupid to spend time and money developing it for a few people when they can spend that time developing other things for those 32bit people who will be the future customers, no?

Loriel 06-12-2004 03:13 PM

Uhm, 64bit will be the future, not 32bit.
And that is exactly the point of my thread, finding out who would be interested in a 64bit version...

Crono 06-12-2004 05:12 PM

You're talking about the new 64bit cpus right @_@? If so, I don't think the majority of the people here have it but it IS going to dominate in the future anyway so you might as well start :O

Spark910 06-12-2004 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Uhm, 64bit will be the future, not 32bit.
And that is exactly the point of my thread, finding out who would be interested in a 64bit version...

But we do not understand it, because we don't have the ability to run a 64bit binary, so I doubt there will be much interest.

Alexander 06-12-2004 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gerami
You're talking about the new 64bit cpus right @_@? If so, I don't think the majority of the people here have it but it IS going to dominate in the future anyway so you might as well start :O

They aren't exactly new, they existed for over 10 years..........

Loriel 06-12-2004 06:14 PM

If you do not understand it and do not care enough to do some research, why even post?

Spark910 06-12-2004 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
If you do not understand it and do not care enough to do some research, why even post?

I was being sarcastic at your criticism of the users on the boards, who you feel wouldn't have the ability to run a '64bit binary'.

And possibly could you be considerate to those who do not use the Hybrid/Threaded mode and use QUOTES?


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.