Hybrid ?
 

Im kind of wondering how many people are in hybrid ? I see alot of people with hybrid tags running all over 2k1.. It seems everyone and their momma is in the guild now.. So i am wondering how many people have a Hybrid tag ?
-Nappa

Farin owns it it's a PKing guild and they all hate me and are going to try to kill me when it's out.
Notice i said try

It sounds like you're saying that you're better than everyone in Hybrid. Don't make me prove you wrong. :(

i'm so not saying that.

Re: Hybrid ?
 

Check the Guild listing. It'll tell you how many members are in it.

hybrid is for losers

If you don't want to PK/be PKed, simply stay in a NPK or Kingdom zone. Simple.

Are you the king of losers ? <3

:D most definitley am.

Why did you add so many people to hybrid anyway ? I used to think it was an honor to be in Hybrid.. Now.. I'm thinking about quitting.

i am in hybrid 8D
i joined back when i went by vamp :O

i add people that... are cool.

another reason it has so many members is the inactive old members. there are around 25 of them. and i cant remove anyone right now :D

You went by the name vamp? and ruined my event's on Doomday and kept saying "OMG EMILY BISH I WON I WON GIMME PRIZE" when i hosted go-karts and you got last? if so then DAMN you were annoying -_-

hey! guess what! that wasn't me.
how can you call that anoying, when your the one who was on 2k1 looking for trainers, i saw you and you asked me to keep it between us. rofl, i went to intel's site and i even saw you in the shoutout box asking for trainers.
and also i would like to add on your countless pointless threads.

Well I guess that you would know what being annoying is :rolleyes:

I saw it also on intel.

Which brings up the point: Why are any of you visiting that site?

Why not? It's not like they were looking for trainers. They probably went to the link posted in the main Graal forum, as I did, and just read the shoutbox. It's not wrong just to go to their site, man.

Is this something you can prove?

By going there, you only help their site out by giving them hits and showing that people are interested in their activities. I never said it was wrong - I asked why any of them were going there.

No, but I'm sure Amagius and Valder are smart enough to not use trainers. -_-

People are interested. I don't see your point. I went there. Does that mean I was looking for trainers?

Perhaps, but again, that neither was nor is my point.

My point was that I wanted to know why they were going there. This is the third time I've said it. Need I say it a fourth?

Uhh.. i'm not an idiot i don't want a trainer to use on Graal2001 or anything because i know there all password stealers.

Ha.

Excuses excuses.

When did this thread go terribly off topic ?

When i asked Geno if that was him on Doomsday.
Also Intelligience doesen't even have any trainers and i already know where to get awesome trainers so if i wanted to use one woulden't you think i would already be using it?

I no longer trust you that you will not use trainers, after seeing that.

What is that supposed to mean? Why would i care?
Why would i want to use a trainer when i know:
They steal you're password and i just spent like 60 something $
on Graal.
They can get you jailed/banned make people hate you
And can put a virus on you're computer.

So you asked for one, why?

Not to mention, by asking this you are breaking the disclaimer. You don't know **** about what's inside the place; it could be candy and porn. There aren't any trainers anyways, nor a chance you would care for them even there were. You, as Graal - related management would not know, or that would be breaking a disclaimer.

Yep, they all are out to kill everyone. Trainers are the darkness of humanity and will devour our, our souls, and then our passwords.

You would think, but I thought all trainers are password stealers and would devour our passwords. :rolleyes:

I enjoy it, and m1nt isn't all that evil. Friendly chap. Not to mention he's pretty kind. He got off crap and is living without the weed and stuff for his girlfriend.

Do you understand what a disclaimer is? I do believe that neither you nor m1nt fully comprehend the concept. Then again, this may stem from his and perhaps your failure to comprehend the concept of "legal."

You say that by asking that, I'm somehow violating the text on his webpage? My, I should perhaps ask some divine being to assist me, I did not heed some ten year old's little warning.

I wouldn't know what's on the site? I wonder why that is? The Men in Black must have come to my house and neuralized me without me knowing, because I sure recall investigating when someone reported a trainer URL to me.

Otherwise, you somehow seem to imply that their little warning that says I am not allowed to enter is somehow legally binding?

Ahahaha...that's got to be the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. Ever.

Do I care how nice m1nt is? He runs a site dedicated to the destruction of an online game by illegal means - sites like that are illegal, by the way.

And the game is over. Final score: Tseng-1, Amagius-0

Why does it matter why someone was somewhere? I've been to a porn site. I don't really see why it's any of your business. M1nt is pretty intelligent for his age, and I play Counter-Strike with him. Does that make me an evil anti-Graal kid?

Hypothetical situation. You went to a meeting with a group of people; since then, all of whom but you have been found guilty of participating in suicide bombing attacks. By that same logic: why does it matter why you were meeting with them?

No, it means you were hanging around with one.

People are, after all, judged by the company they keep.

I'm too lazy to quote two things, so I'll just number them.

1.) Being in the meeting is much different than passing by the meeting.

2.) Yes. I'm sure all of unixmad's real friends think of him as a Graal administrator.

We're going to go through this slowly, so we can take this step by step just for your little fragmented mind.

1.1 What is a disclaimer?

First, let us turn to good American Heirtage.

1.)A repudiation or denial of responsibility or connection.
2.)Law. A renunciation of one's right or claim.

Hmm, from this, as stated, it would mean that m1nt is disconnected from it and all work! So, he wouldn't be proseceuted, like Unixmad's letter said!

But wait, Amagius, I don't believe American Heirtage understands the situation. Ok! Let's turn to Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

1.)1. One who disclaims, disowns, or renounces.
2.)(Law) A denial, disavowal, or renunciation, as of a title, claim, interest, estate, or trust; relinquishment or waiver of an interest or estate. --Burrill.
3.)A public disavowal, as of pretensions, claims, opinions, and the like. --Burke.

Hmm, says the same thing. Wait, Amagius! The meaning of Disclaimer didn't say I wouldn't be able to access the site if I was related to GraalOnline or Linux Cyberjourers! That doesn't make sense, silly Amagius!

Well, I'll chock that up in the next section.

1.2. What can go in a disclaimer?

Ahh, this is the one.

1.)Obviously, that a owner can "disclaim" him or herself from the work.
2.) All hypertext links and 3rd parties are safe.
3.) that this site can disallow government officials or one's in the name reading, or others affiliated with whoever they chose. Were one of that to attempt to press charges, it could be cut down AND
and the site could sue for a fine.

It's like Role-Playing. Your buddy PMs you from the other kingdom about the other kingdom and it's plan. You aren't suyppose to know this, and it's nulled.

All this (except for the Roleplaying example) were and/or are stated in Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act put into effecdt in 1995, by one Bill Clinton. It has not and (most probably) will not be removed. The site could disallow Hindus to come to the site, and if a Hindu attempted slander, libel, tort law, pressed other charges because of files under the disclaimer, that would null it.

Meaning you as a read off to Unixmad, Unixmad, Nemesis or othewrs aren't allowed. If you were to press charges in any way, in any way, it would be nulled.

Now, Tseng, maybe we got off on the wrong foot here. Intelligence isn't going anywhere, soon; BUT, you can access the site, enjoy it's raptures, and such, but if you were to tell it off to Unixmad or Stefan for legal actions, natta. To inspect the site is a breach of such, and if you were to use any of it against them, talk about them publically using information, or otherwise, ya, you can go and leave.

POINT: It cannot be used against him or them (them being Intelligence).

2.1 What is the American Government?

Your. ****ing. Leader. They've created these rules, and if broken, can be prosecuted. Intelligence is hosted on American soil, so no country seperation.

2.2 You didn't give a chapter name. Why is this and why'd you make a 2 if there is none?

Well, it seemed proper.

Pathetic attempt to display intelligence which you lack.

Those lines cannot prevent legal action against the site - by your logic, anyone who did anything illegal on a website could put a disclaimer so that they could not be subject to lawsuit - and that idea is of course inherantly flawed.

Think -> Post.

What text is illegal on his webpage?

We are not debating the illegality of m1nt's website. We are debating the disclaimer and its relation to lawsuits.

Amagius would have me believe that any idiot could put up a disclaimer against anyone to prevent legal action, which is not the case.

You seem to have trouble seeing points, Neonight.

Oh, I forgot, you hear that story about a thief breaking in and breaking his leg? he sued the owners and he won. Flawed? Yes, but U.S. law let it? Yes.

Also, you think m1nt's site is bent on destruction? Ha. I'm sre if he was bent on descruction, the reign of terro would have started by now. Come to his site. Look at files. No trainers. None. Notta.

Think -> |Tseng| -> Crap.

Instead of resorting to a petty insult against me, why not respond to my main point? (And, before you tell me I should follow my own advice, I did respond to your point. :p)

Quoted, for your easy viewing pleasure: