| LordZen |
06-13-2003 04:01 PM |
The change from a monarchial system to a republic was mostly RP, I know I'm not treating you guys any different than before (considering Dictatorships sound evil), if not better. ;)
This is what I show partymembers, and people who ask:
Quote:
~National Archist Party of Zormite (NAPZ)~
This political party was the first formed after the Zormite Reconstruction Era of 1603-1608AE. During that period, the monarchial system fell apart, and radical reforms were implemented to modernize the government. These reforms were seen as absolutely crucial to the survival of the state, because during this period Zormite witnessed many of its neighbors going through revolution after revolution. The excessive exchanging of power among those states (leader after leader) was seen as a weakness. The leaders of Zormite sought a method to circumvent similar happenings within their borders, and when Zormite Golden Age ended it caused panic.
The National Archist Party of Zormite (NAPZ) emerged as the only truly organized group prepared to take on the responsibilites of governing the people. They were a group of loyalists to the former ruling family: Archigos. Their political ideology developed into Archism. Archism is the belief that the traditional royal bloodline of Archigos was seen as most fit to rule. The Archists were also fully aware of the dangers of a weak government, and advocated the importance of preserving the state as a whole. Their main focus was to preserve the monarchy in some form, while modernizing the government to increase stability.
This view of Archism can be more generalized into being "a political belief in which stability of a state is sought to be enhanced by modernizing a government, while preserving important traditional values of the culture. A constant emphasis on the importance of maintaining a functioning independent governing body is evident in the policies enforced within an Archist system."
|
The date in there I had to make up because GK doesnt have an in-game system of keeping track of that kinda thing.
Besides, Julius Ceasar was given the title of Dictator under the Roman Republic. The deffinition of a republic doesnt rule out that possibility. |
