this(or not).string question
 

If I replaced this in a this.string with something else (say...that.string), would I be able to have a script only recognize the that.strings?

(P.S. This is for strings set using setstring)

Re: this(or not).string question
 

no

Re: Re: this(or not).string question
 

We don't need reiderations (sp?), once is enough.

***aghagygh, Okay, thanks.

Gah, now I gotta do this thi long way XD

What do you need to use it for? I’ve used setstring this.#a,#p(0); before for a notification script. And it checks this.#a to see if it has a value, and then it sends a message to all the tokens (after it’s tokenized) so you could do it that way. Or you could make it like:
Setstring this.string#v(this.var),value;
That way it would do it, and you could call it and such. No reason for a that.string anyway =/
---Shifter

That wouldn't work, since it was going to be a list of 100 or so "items"

*cough*
String Array
*cough*

*rolls* That is another option if it's going to be huge. There isn't a reason though you can't use a string array, or if you're a noobie ;) use setstring this.string#v(this.var),value; instead :P but I don't use string arrays unless I need to keep track of data more and for a larger quantity.
---Shifter

You can't keep string arrays seperate from other string arrays though.

@_@ *imagines someone rolling around on the floor by the computer*


and googi, what are you talking about =x? its called using different string names?

I think I'm liking Jagen a bit more each day :D EXACTLY, you CAN keep them different x.X =/
---Shifter

I mean keeping a group of string arrays seperate from every other string array.

Not keeping a single string seperate.

setstring this.stringarray1,googi,stfu,:P;
setstring this.stringarray2,You,can,keep,them,seperate;
setstring this.stringarray3,If,you,cant,then,you,are,dumb,:P ;

:-\

That's what I meant by "the long way"