Rate pleeeaseee?
 

Here's a level i made for my LAT tryout for classic, which got me thru :D
I wanna see what you guys make of it :P Anyway, here it is:

That got you through...?

Er, I'd give it a 4-5/10.

:( someone's stingy with their level rating. What's wrong with it, if it gets THAT low? yes, its simple, but i think it looks nice. Not all good levels have to have complex houses and good looking cliffs and stuff.

Sorry. I forgot classic and 2001 levels have a difference of style.


It's a nice level. Overall, I'd give it a 7/10

mmmmkay: Well toran I think your rating was good (5). Look at the ground tiling, to be a classic LAT I'd like to see more advanced than that. And the level itself is rather plain. But then most of it is forest, so a higher rating can't really be achieved.

A bit plain in the work of tiles... if you want to be in LAT, be more creative with tile placing. Don't just make the obvious...

Did you try out with the June application? If you did, I voted against you. I know that classic has a lower bar for level making, but the LEAST you could do is fix the tile errors.

Where's the application?


;)

id give it a 5/10...its nice but it could be detailed alot, make the river a bit more interesting, its so incredibly straight...but its alright

mmmmkay: Only tile errors I see are millions of half grass tiles.

And those are bad enough.

There is also one in the bottom right trees.

Ok, so I like to nit-pick ;)

mmmmkay: Observant, I see it now. ;)

bah, the half grass is detail. using the full sized grass makes it look too repetitive, and the level isnt supposed to be full of detail, it's supposed to be a plain, everyday forest level, and i AM a classic lat, it got me through, along wit others :P but yes, i do apologise for the one tile error. Very observant :D

half-grassed = half-assed.