TrueHeaT and i have talked about it one night and we think we have a solid idea.

We think there should be 4 castles.
1 medieval - King Asuka
1 samurai - King Tybalt/TrueHeaT whichever one
then 2 more either water palace forest swamp ice whatever that king wants

The reasons we think there should be 4 is so that there could be wars and allying. It would greaten the roleplay experience. Also if one king decides that he doesnt want to be king anymore then there should be another vote or something to decide the new king then they would roleplay an overthrowing of the king and such.

how about cavern castle where i'd be king (since i made bomy caverns) =D

it could happen all i know is that i want a medieval type castle and Trueheat wants a samurai castle.

I want an underground sewer castle with a large army so I can rise to the surface and RULE THE WORLD!@

LOL will your army consist of rats?

I would want a castle that I made... and I would also like for me to be king. =)

I would be with TrueHeaT

I would make the water castle! King of the fish :D

:D!!!

Okay, I think a Water Castle (Fish :D), a cavern castle (bomys), a medeival castle (err, people) and a Samurai Castle (other... people) would be the perfect mix.

But what about my plans for further world domination?

I'm afraid that if I'm a guard to Tybalt I may just have to kill him and be the king. :D

Hmm, sure, a stinky underground kingdom for vermain :D

I think there should be 2 castles, and have a leader for each castle and have 2 armies and make them go to war or something like that.

I DO NOT KNOW!@

Uh...?
That's stupid.

no

4 would be better

4 castles?

NO, FOUR BANANAS.

I DO NOT LIKE BANANAS, TRUEHEAT! :(

Maybe we should go back to topic.

You're the one who used the word banana, ***got.

Ah, brotherly love

TrueHeaT stole my glox. I hate him.

The wars would be better if there were only 2 castles. And 4 castles is overkill.

If there were two, though, I'd have trouble deciding a side to be on... :(

Blah.
 

I'll just build a hut at the borders of each kingdom and get pissed off every time there is a war because my hut get's destroyed again.

i think there should be a snow castle up on the mountain and i would be king of course

I think.......................... There should be 2 because having guards stand there all day and the king sit there is stoopid. It would be better like with 2.

This isn't about what would make the better war. This is how to greater the Roleplay experience and having at least 4 kingdoms is much better. Why?

There could be diplomats to go to different kingdoms and try to work out deals to become allies and fight against the rival kingdoms. Who knows. with 4 kingdoms it could become 3 vs 1 and actually would be really fun Roleplay the 1 kingdom would have to work really hard to either gain enough troops to hold back the 3 kingdoms or work hard politically to try and find allies. Also with more kingdoms more people would be able to roleplay the traitor (the person who quits his homeland and runs to a new country and is hated by his family)

It's not a question of what would make a more better and convenient war. It's a question of what would make the easiest roleplay with the most roleplay elements.

If there were only 2 kingdoms it would basically be constant war. Very few traitors, no need for diplomats. And basically the only thing you could roleplay are guards and soldiers. Not very fun so there needs to be AT LEAST 4

ALL YOUR CASTLES ARE BELONG TO US!

OH YEAH as for vermain you could roleplay the underground alliance. The "rejects" from the other castles who rise up and try to take over castle after castle.

ASUKA, YOU ARE ON THE WAY TO DESTRUCTION!

I'll make bomy caverns a safe place for those who are smart and won't to fight. =D
There'll be bunk houses and a red cross soup kitchen =D
And I'll put huge arse rocks in the river opening and doors to the outside so we can be safe while everyone fights and Graal get destroyed by weird people. =D

This is not a good idea, soon everyone will want a castle and it will get all mumble jumbled, it will happen SSMutz has already wanted to get a castle goin, and soon a whole crapload of other people will and it will get out of hand.

Actually we are allowing 4 no more no less and if you want to become king u must overthrow the other king in ROLEPLAY you can't just go IF I BEAT YOU IN A SPAR OR CTF THEN I AM KING!

You didn't read my post correctly. I don't want to make a friggin castle. I want to make shelter for those who are smart and don't want to fight.

I didn't mean war as in war, I meant war as in roleplaying war. If there war four castles it would be more difficult to arrange anything because less people from each castle would be available. Everything would be complicated.

Me want to be a king!

How do you overthrow someone through roleplaying?

There doesnt need to be that much war roleplaying isn't just war. There would be more roleplay elements with 4 kingdoms also with allies you wouldn't need just your kingdom online you could have help from your ally.

Are you sure? you can be the bomy king and you could have caverns for your underground castle.